Letter About the New England Pirates. [col. Papers, Vol. Lv., No. 60.] Read Online

Y'all know well-nigh how individuals proceeds control of the power of the Country and then abuse that ability similar former United states President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons plan which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when information technology had already been bombed into oblivion by the state of war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Recollect how Bush was supported past UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not be but which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Find how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin can salvage united states of america all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this 24-hour interval.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The upshot cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Modest Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty illness called smallpox and it did impale people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for piece of work and high-strung them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'due south first park congenital later on rich feared disease spread from slums Britain The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would go along them safety from the threat of disease.  The bulk of the population of unabridged countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The problem was this was a myth just the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the illness itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, UK, United states of america, Sweden.

Now yous can read a relatively short simply well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doctor – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below observe the large numbers of deaths acquired past the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, equally the medical "consensus" view tells us. Whatsoever vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did non.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the refuse in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residue of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox expiry rates plummeted [run into table beneath].  Leicester's approach also toll far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Volume as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Pocket-sized-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (Uk)	1860-1908	1,355	96	seven.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.one
British Regular army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Regal Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	one,206	61	5.i

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? Information technology would beget an interesting psychical report were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would take soared with a respective result—but on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Toll of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	one,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	xi.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.ten	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching flu flavor and the enthusiastic calls to use the influenza vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavour to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country doc and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or equally it was often chosen the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this archetype tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-twelvemonth erstwhile boy named James Phipps to exam his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps's easily. The boy came downward with a slight fever, but cipher more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a full-blown, admitting balmy, case of the illness. Aught happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; once again, nil. [1]

Edward Jenner'south idea eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, just eventually the term vaccination was adopted. Every bit the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the dauntless hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, attain an iconic status while whatever unsavory aspects nigh the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of good for you people. This idea was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the exercise of inoculation confronting smallpox, known equally variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practice better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded past the wealthy.[iii] The procedure did often help protect the private that was inoculated, but there was still an estimated two-five% that died as a result.[4,5] All the same, this was an improvement compared to a twenty-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation solitary? Or could information technology have had something to exercise with the fact that the wealthy had meliorate admission to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

In that location was one major and mostly unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would take been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years afterwards, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

Information technology is incontestably similar the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a eye of contamination, whence information technology spreads non less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are evidently multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

Still, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically connected past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread by this medically-sanctioned process.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amidst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-twelvemonth-onetime male child named James Phipps. He took affliction matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to encounter if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be allowed to smallpox, in that location were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, considering they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning in that location were bug with Jenner'southward procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox thing obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to meet if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them adult smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report merely decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was chop-chop embraced by many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community connected to cover Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month later information technology was inoculated with small-pox affair without effect, and a few months later on took confluent modest-pox and died. ii. A woman-servant to Mr. Run a risk, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had moo-cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Infirmary, where she defenseless modest-pox, and died. three and four. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-scale-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-sized-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's role . . . died of pocket-sized-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-scale-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a directly challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the almost good practitioners, is now alarmingly groovy.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with thirty years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no ane in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine exercise." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the do.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were amply compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to cover it every bit a new form of income. It is therefore quite meaning for a doctor to take spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, i, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a great hubbub near the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the due north . . . It pressed close to habitation to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had small-pox before, and ofttimes severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote nearly the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical exercise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the existent minor-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this fourth dimension vaccine fabric was the "humanized" class, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but equally failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious status of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[xviii] This faulty belief would result in the cosmos of more than smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human being who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'southward udder. He then took pus from that moo-cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than than the sometime practice of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not just was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, only there were also reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For case, a peel condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged five years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; i cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. But facts accumulated more than and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what information technology was promised to be, refusals increased. In guild to bargain with this, the judicial organisation intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nil to curb the trouble of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, at that place were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the groovy 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no outcome at all (Graph i). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this indicate, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less probable to kill or that smallpox would exist milder. Calls were and then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to exist performed anywhere from yearly to every ten years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of law created the perfect environs that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lonely they amounted to £54,727, and in the present twelvemonth they will get nearly a quarter 1000000. Other sums, besides, which I cannot proper name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Still, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics connected to occur. A bully pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French ground forces is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three chiliad four hundred and 60-9 cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of ix 1000 3 hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, vi grand eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole state more than one hundred and twenty-ii thousand vaccinated persons accept suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany prove that between 1870 and 1885 i million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine move. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the keen sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective ways that eliminated the demand for vaccination. Even so, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination charge per unit would event in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually exist plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[thirty] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing boondocks having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an feel extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-sized-pox and far less afflicted by that affliction since it abandoned vaccination than information technology was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted every bit a safe process, information technology oft caused sickness or even expiry. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the aforementioned (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph four: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the cease of the 1800s, smallpox changed its grapheme. After the summertime of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed one in five of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and after to as low every bit ane in 380. The illness could nonetheless kill, but having go so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or peel eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Periodical of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around 20%, equally it had been historically. The table likewise showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off speedily, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. As the balmy grade of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be hard to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a pocket-size communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important because information technology oftentimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the mode of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage charge per unit, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major consequence, the practise of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox expiry in the The states in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this illness was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that about cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were likewise an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time in that location had only been 1 smallpox decease in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox expiry in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that fourth dimension there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is notwithstanding occurring today, every bit recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his armed services male parent after the male parent was vaccinated. Subsequently a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent also required treatment and virus was institute all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been even higher. This study simply examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire earth?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are aback to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if nosotros did the accident of some future epidemic might put u.s. in the wrong. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the only medically promoted way to deal with disease, at that place were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient production that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a rubber in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed ii table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the rubber treatment died, while amongst those under ordinary handling the bloodshed was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to accept care of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the illness. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the thought of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or four times a mean solar day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Guild, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the cracking men who for a century past accept been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need take no fright of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The word may now be regarded every bit airtight, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but only considering most people take been conditioned to accept the age-quondam prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a affliction that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or but an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in peel, bones, and blood vessels and besides gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of Rex'due south College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilt miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fatty pork and flour fabricated into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of stiff coffee, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching lord's day, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the almost intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated x,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases every bit those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such equally smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for simply a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for ane percent of the full deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive pass up of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & vi).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping coughing mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph six: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land doc making a discovery that saved the globe from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and accept since vanished from societal collective retention. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's bang-up discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular affair from cradle to grave, all in the proper name of supposedly healthier people. At present that the mantle has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more than vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, Doc, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of N-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
half-dozen.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard'southward Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Eight, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brownish, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
xvi.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
xviii.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the Usa," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
xx.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the Country of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. iv, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, Md, "A Doc'south Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Wellness, Non by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. W. Hodge, Doctor, "How Small-scale-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease as Shown past the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufacturing plant Lancaster, An introduction to the practise of preventive medicine, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book 1, W.B. Saunders Visitor, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Doctor, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. ane, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Half-dozen, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Rex's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

meyersthictly.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post